<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: lit and lighted</title> <atom:link href="http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:26:26 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Laura H.</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-581</link> <dc:creator>Laura H.</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:32:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-581</guid> <description>Loss of irregular verb conjugation seems to be happening in US English frequently these days.  It used to be that a defendant &quot;pled&quot; guilty or not guilty.  Now I hear &quot;pleaded&quot; instead.  The same thing seems to be happening with &quot;dove&quot; and &quot;dived&quot;.  I guess this is just part of natural trend towards simplicity (handling all verbs the same way), but it bothers me a lot. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loss of irregular verb conjugation seems to be happening in US English frequently these days.  It used to be that a defendant &#8220;pled&#8221; guilty or not guilty.  Now I hear &#8220;pleaded&#8221; instead.  The same thing seems to be happening with &#8220;dove&#8221; and &#8220;dived&#8221;.  I guess this is just part of natural trend towards simplicity (handling all verbs the same way), but it bothers me a lot.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mylla</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-580</link> <dc:creator>Mylla</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 16:40:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-580</guid> <description>Wow!  I love your site!  I am a high school student and these are exactly the kind of questions I&#039;m dealing with!
Personally, I use the word &#039;lit&#039; (and I&#039;m from the midwest).  &#039;Lighted&#039; is just too much of a mouthful.  It could be that I&#039;m just being lazy.  ;-)
Ok-  Related Question:
I don&#039;t think I can say &#039;relit&#039; or &#039;relighted&#039;.  Neither of these words are in my dictionary.  However, &#039;relight&#039; is(!).  I suppose I probably need to say &#039;he lit the torch again&#039;.  For some reason it sounds a little awkward to me.  8-\  Is there something I am missing? </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  I love your site!  I am a high school student and these are exactly the kind of questions I&#8217;m dealing with!<br
/> Personally, I use the word &#8216;lit&#8217; (and I&#8217;m from the midwest).  &#8216;Lighted&#8217; is just too much of a mouthful.  It could be that I&#8217;m just being lazy. <img
src='http://www.englishrules.com/writing/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br
/> Ok-  Related Question:<br
/> I don&#8217;t think I can say &#8216;relit&#8217; or &#8216;relighted&#8217;.  Neither of these words are in my dictionary.  However, &#8216;relight&#8217; is(!).  I suppose I probably need to say &#8216;he lit the torch again&#8217;.  For some reason it sounds a little awkward to me.  8-\  Is there something I am missing?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Keppel</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-579</link> <dc:creator>David Keppel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:28:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-579</guid> <description>Re. Andrew&#039;s comment that &quot;lighted&quot; is older:
I think &quot;lit&quot; is older.  In general, Old English verbs were &quot;strong&quot;: they had &quot;ablaut&quot; and changed the quality of the vowel in different tenses.  As time went on, strong verbs were treated as weak: the vowel quality remained but -ed was added.  That does not mean that &quot;lit&quot; is necessarily better in either British or American English.  Both seem to be acceptable in both.  By contrast, &quot;dived&quot; is now considered more &quot;educated&quot; usage than &quot;dove.&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re. Andrew&#8217;s comment that &#8220;lighted&#8221; is older:<br
/> I think &#8220;lit&#8221; is older.  In general, Old English verbs were &#8220;strong&#8221;: they had &#8220;ablaut&#8221; and changed the quality of the vowel in different tenses.  As time went on, strong verbs were treated as weak: the vowel quality remained but -ed was added.  That does not mean that &#8220;lit&#8221; is necessarily better in either British or American English.  Both seem to be acceptable in both.  By contrast, &#8220;dived&#8221; is now considered more &#8220;educated&#8221; usage than &#8220;dove.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alok</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-578</link> <dc:creator>Alok</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2007 02:39:28 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-578</guid> <description>Ravi,
I would say why wish. You are face to face just thanks.
So I would prefer.
I appreciate your advice, and thank you once again for your precious time. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravi,<br
/> I would say why wish. You are face to face just thanks.<br
/> So I would prefer.<br
/> I appreciate your advice, and thank you once again for your precious time.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ruth</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-577</link> <dc:creator>Ruth</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2007 14:14:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-577</guid> <description>Ravi - I would choose number 3 in your example. The subject I is understood in the second independent clause; therefore, the correct usage would be as follows:
I appreciate your advice, and (I) wish to thank you once again for your time.
Number 2 would never be correct, but you could use number 1. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ravi &#8211; I would choose number 3 in your example. The subject I is understood in the second independent clause; therefore, the correct usage would be as follows:<br
/> I appreciate your advice, and (I) wish to thank you once again for your time.<br
/> Number 2 would never be correct, but you could use number 1.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Karl</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-576</link> <dc:creator>Karl</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:49:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-576</guid> <description>That is a fascinating distinction, Russell! Thanks for posting the comment. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is a fascinating distinction, Russell! Thanks for posting the comment.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Russell Kennedy</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-575</link> <dc:creator>Russell Kennedy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:43:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-575</guid> <description>In US Coast Guard terminology an aid to navigation is Lighted if it has a light installed on it.  It is Lit if the light is turned on. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In US Coast Guard terminology an aid to navigation is Lighted if it has a light installed on it.  It is Lit if the light is turned on.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ravi bedi</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-574</link> <dc:creator>ravi bedi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:45:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-574</guid> <description>Which of these is the right choice:
1. I appreciate your advice and wish to thank you, once again, for your time.
2. I appreciate your advice and wish to thank you once again, for your time.
3. I appreciate your advice, and wish to thank you once again for your time.
Or, is there a better one. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which of these is the right choice:<br
/> 1. I appreciate your advice and wish to thank you, once again, for your time.<br
/> 2. I appreciate your advice and wish to thank you once again, for your time.<br
/> 3. I appreciate your advice, and wish to thank you once again for your time.<br
/> Or, is there a better one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: ravi bedi</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-573</link> <dc:creator>ravi bedi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2007 09:36:58 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-573</guid> <description>aaron, would this not be better:
&quot;He couldn&#039;t go to play because he didn&#039;t finish his homework.&quot; </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aaron, would this not be better:<br
/> &#8220;He couldn&#8217;t go to play because he didn&#8217;t finish his homework.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrew</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-572</link> <dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 14:41:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2006/lit-and-lighted/#comment-572</guid> <description>I also prefer &quot;lit.&quot; It&#039;s more concise, and there&#039;s something a bit awkward about the sound of &quot;lighted.&quot; Still, &quot;lighted&quot; is the older of the two.... </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also prefer &#8220;lit.&#8221; It&#8217;s more concise, and there&#8217;s something a bit awkward about the sound of &#8220;lighted.&#8221; Still, &#8220;lighted&#8221; is the older of the two&#8230;.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)

Served from: www.englishrules.com @ 2012-02-12 06:45:10 -->
