<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
><channel><title>Word of the Day</title> <atom:link href="http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 May 2010 02:54:33 +0000</lastBuildDate> <language>en</language> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>apparatchik</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/apparatchik/</link> <comments>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/apparatchik/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 21:38:15 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Karl Swedberg</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/10/05/apparatchik/</guid> <description><![CDATA[a blindly devoted official, follower, or member of an organization (as a corporation or political party)
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a blindly devoted official, follower, or member of an organization (as a corporation or political party)</p><p><span
id="more-510"></span><br
/> This word appears in <a
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/05/opinion/05krugman.html?_r=1">an editorial by Paul Krugman</a> in the New York Times: &#8220;The key point is that ever since the Reagan years, the Republican Party has been dominated by radicals &#8212; ideologues and/or <strong>apparatchiks</strong> who, at a fundamental level, do not accept anyone else&#8217;s right to govern.&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/apparatchik/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>lachrymose</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/lachrymose/</link> <comments>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/lachrymose/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:47:52 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Karl Swedberg</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/10/03/lachrymose/</guid> <description><![CDATA[tearful or given to weeping
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>tearful or given to weeping</p><p><span
id="more-509"></span><br
/> I just read an article that described Rainer Maria Rilke as, among other things, lachrymose.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/lachrymose/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>maladroit</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/maladroit/</link> <comments>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/maladroit/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 13:16:34 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Karl Swedberg</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/07/19/maladroit/</guid> <description><![CDATA[ineffective or bungling; clumsy
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ineffective or bungling; clumsy</p><p><span
id="more-508"></span><br
/> This word appeared in a Newsweek article that I read a few weeks ago. I think it was referring to the Bush presidency.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/maladroit/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>fartlek</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/fartlek/</link> <comments>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/fartlek/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 19:55:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Karl Swedberg</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/07/01/fartlek/</guid> <description><![CDATA[a system of training for distance runners in which the terrain and pace are continually varied to eliminate boredom and enhance psychological aspects of conditioning
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a system of training for distance runners in which the terrain and pace are continually varied to eliminate boredom and enhance psychological aspects of conditioning</p><p><span
id="more-507"></span><br
/> This is a funny word. Hehe. My friend and I were talking about training today, and this word came up. It&#8217;s from the Swedish: <em>fart  (&#8220;speed&#8221;) + lek (&#8220;play&#8221;)</em>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/fartlek/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>anomie</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/anomie/</link> <comments>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/anomie/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:18:12 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Karl Swedberg</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/06/28/anomie/</guid> <description><![CDATA[alienation or social instability caused by erosion of social or ethical standards and values
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>alienation or social instability caused by erosion of social or ethical standards and values</p><p><span
id="more-506"></span><br
/> I came across this word in a New Yorker article recently. Can&#8217;t remember which one.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/anomie/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>dyspeptic</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/dyspeptic/</link> <comments>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/dyspeptic/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 08:54:32 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Karl Swedberg</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/01/15/dyspeptic/</guid> <description><![CDATA[of or having indigestion or consequent irritability or depression; displaying a morose disposition
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>of or having indigestion or consequent irritability or depression; displaying a morose disposition</p><p><span
id="more-505"></span><br
/> I came across this word in a <a
href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1116591/Adventures-posh-girl-Poundland-How-Harvey-Nicks-fan-cope-cheapest-shop-town.html">Daily Mail article</a>: &#8220;The shop assistant in Poundland is becoming increasingly <strong>dyspeptic</strong>. In fact, I&#8217;m concerned he might just turn round and hit me.&#8221; Not sure what I was doing reading the <i>Daily Mail</i>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/dyspeptic/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>sesquipedalian</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/sesquipedalian/</link> <comments>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/sesquipedalian/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:11:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Karl Swedberg</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/01/13/sesquipedalian/</guid> <description><![CDATA[characterized by long words; long-winded
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>characterized by long words; long-winded</p><p><span
id="more-504"></span><br
/> One of the characters in <i>The Mysterious Benedict Society</i> is S. Q. Pedialian. I&#8217;ve been reading the book to my son, and we&#8217;ve been loving it.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/sesquipedalian/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>imprecation</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/imprecation/</link> <comments>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/imprecation/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:16:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Karl Swedberg</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/01/06/imprecation/</guid> <description><![CDATA[a spoken curse
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a spoken curse</p><p><span
id="more-503"></span><br
/> William Safire has <a
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/magazine/04wwln_safire-t.html?_r=1&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink">a great &#8220;On Language&#8221; column</a> in the December 31, 2008, edition of the <i>New York Times Magazine</i>. About the words <i>imprecation</i> and <i>execration</i>, he writes: &#8220;These bookish terms of excessive condemnation are out of critical fashion, merely evoking the exclamation by Snoopy, the cartoon character from Peanuts, &#8216;Curse you, Red Baron!&#8217;&#8221;</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2009/imprecation/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>complement</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2008/complement/</link> <comments>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2008/complement/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:39:00 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Karl Swedberg</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2008/12/15/complement/</guid> <description><![CDATA[[verb] add to (something) in a way that enhances or improves it; make perfect; add to or make complete
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[verb] add to (something) in a way that enhances or improves it; make perfect; add to or make complete</p><p><span
id="more-502"></span><br
/> The noun form of this word has a few definitions, but I wanted to focus on the verb form, because, much to my surprise, somebody used this word correctly on Twitter today. Too often people write &#8220;compliment&#8221; when they mean &#8220;complement.&#8221; And that irks me.</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2008/complement/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> </item> <item><title>fulgent</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2008/fulgent/</link> <comments>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2008/fulgent/#comments</comments> <pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 18:14:27 +0000</pubDate> <dc:creator>Karl Swedberg</dc:creator> <category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category><guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2008/11/09/fulgent/</guid> <description><![CDATA[shining brightly
]]></description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shining brightly</p><p><span
id="more-501"></span><br
/> This word appears in a <a
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/09/opinion/09kristof.html?hp">New York Times editorial</a> by Nicholas D. Kristof: &ldquo;a pedant is a supercilious show-off who drops references to Sophocles and masks his shallowness by using words like &lsquo;fulgent&rsquo; and &lsquo;supercilious.&rsquo; &rdquo;</p> ]]></content:encoded> <wfw:commentRss>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2008/fulgent/feed/</wfw:commentRss> <slash:comments>1</slash:comments> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching using disk: basic
Object Caching 416/508 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.englishrules.com @ 2012-02-09 15:30:12 -->
