<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: nonplused</title> <atom:link href="http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2004/nonplused/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2004/nonplused/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 03:24:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Quacker</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2004/nonplused/#comment-7</link> <dc:creator>Quacker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:06:54 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2004/11/10/nonplused/#comment-7</guid> <description>Usage determines language. It appears that eventually, nonplus will be recognized for the now errant definition. So if you have not yet gotten over it yet, in time you will.
Q </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Usage determines language. It appears that eventually, nonplus will be recognized for the now errant definition. So if you have not yet gotten over it yet, in time you will.<br
/> Q</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: lthomas2</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2004/nonplused/#comment-6</link> <dc:creator>lthomas2</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:11:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2004/11/10/nonplused/#comment-6</guid> <description>THANK YOU. Thank you. Every time I hear someone misuse this word (which is 9 times out of 10) I want to scream, &quot;NON. PLUS. No more!! That means you can&#039;t take anymore!&quot; Pretty much the opposite of &quot;unimpressed,&quot; which is how most people use it. It&#039;s gotten to point that I never use the word myself because most people would either think I was crazy for using it in the correct context (incorrect in their minds), or snooty for trying to make a point (not too far from the truth). It&#039;s gotten almost as bad as &quot;irregardless.&quot; God help us. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THANK YOU. Thank you. Every time I hear someone misuse this word (which is 9 times out of 10) I want to scream, &#8220;NON. PLUS. No more!! That means you can&#8217;t take anymore!&#8221; Pretty much the opposite of &#8220;unimpressed,&#8221; which is how most people use it. It&#8217;s gotten to point that I never use the word myself because most people would either think I was crazy for using it in the correct context (incorrect in their minds), or snooty for trying to make a point (not too far from the truth). It&#8217;s gotten almost as bad as &#8220;irregardless.&#8221; God help us.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: hcq</title><link>http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2004/nonplused/#comment-5</link> <dc:creator>hcq</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 17:57:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.englishrules.com/wotd/2004/11/10/nonplused/#comment-5</guid> <description>The reason there is &quot;no such word as plused...&quot; is because &quot;nonplused&quot; comes from the Latin &quot;non plus,&quot; &quot;no more,&quot; the implication being that the individual is at a loss for words. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason there is &#8220;no such word as plused&#8230;&#8221; is because &#8220;nonplused&#8221; comes from the Latin &#8220;non plus,&#8221; &#8220;no more,&#8221; the implication being that the individual is at a loss for words.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/4 queries in 0.016 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 184/185 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.englishrules.com @ 2012-02-12 01:23:14 -->
